Pulse of Princeton: What would you tell a visitor or newcomer about Princeton?

You’re a True Princetonian Once You Know the True Stories

Is there a place in town that you’ve always wondered about? A story you’ve heard that you just can’t believe to be true? There are many superstitions and historical renditions that people enjoy sharing but often haven’t verified. Princeton Perspectives is now revealing the details behind many of Princeton’s most popular sources of gossip.

Library House(s)

Is it one house or two? Situated at 94 and 104 Library Place are in fact two homes that have become fodder for a lot of conversation. If you’ve ever traveled along Library Place, from Hodge Road toward 206/Stockton Street, a street filled with large properties and grand homes, you likely noticed two of the beautiful homes on the right that sit very close to each other and look shockingly similar. At certain angles, when the trees are in bloom, they actually look like one house, with the greenery making it hard to see about 12 feet of space that sits between the two.

Even local real estate agents aren’t quite sure what the story is. Some believe they are two similar homes that were built by the same builder. Others are confident they were once one home that was split into two. Of those that believe the latter, there are varying rumors for the split – a couple got divorced and neither was willing to give up the house, so they split it; two brothers got the house after their parents’ death and things grew bitter, so they separated it into two. None of the above happen to be the true story.

Last summer a young couple, Aditya Rajagopalan and Alston Gremillion, bought their new home at 104 Library Place. They quickly became eager to understand why all their friends in the area called it “the house cut in half.” For a Christmas gift, Alston’s father, Mark Gremillion, put together a family tree and historical information on the house, which ultimately revealed the little-known tale.

It was discovered that land was purchased, and one single house was built on it from 1901-1903, first inhabited by Dr. David Magie and then just his wife until she sold it in 1924. Estelle Frelinghuysen then bought it and lived there until her death in 1931. That was during the Great Depression, followed by World War II. So, Frelinghuysen’s house sat empty for 13 years until 1944 when the estate was settled and sold to Holder Corporation. Holder felt people were not buying homes of that size at the time and the best way to get it sold was to cut the house in half, into two “smaller” homes. The truth lacks a bit of the drama some of the gossip holds, but it is still a fascinating turn of events.

“They literally just removed a section in the middle,” she explains. “If you walk between the two houses, you can see stucco on either side between them. The other three sides of each house are stone.”

Princetonian’s did witness first-hand how one home can be moved to another lot, when the building on 91 Prospect was moved across the street earlier this year. But, seldom, if ever, has anyone around recently witnessed one home get split into two. To confirm it started as one house, you can see the original home in this old photo and the land map from that time also displays one house on the lot where the two homes sit today.

FitzRandolph Gate

Princeton University architecture has been the source of many stories. You can’t really miss its FitzRandolph Gate, the black iron gate with tall columns alongside Nassau Street, at the intersection of Witherspoon Street. But have you ever walked through it? If so, did you think about how your path might determine your destiny?

Built in 1905, FitzRandolph Gate was erected outside Princeton University’s Nassau Hall to honor Nathaniel FitzRandolph, the man primarily responsible for raising the funds used to purchase the college’s first plot of land in Princeton. The gate was kept closed and locked for decades, opened only during special occasions, and was meant to separate the town from the college. But in the 1970s, it was opened permanently, allegedly as a gesture to open the doors of the university to the town and the world.

Since then, it has been the center of a longtime superstition. Be careful where you go! Legend has it that any undergraduate that exits campus through the center gate (entering is said to be safe) will not graduate. The myth first was believed to have meant you wouldn’t graduate at all, though some interpret it to mean one simply would not graduate on time.

The tradition of avoiding the center entrance is passed along through students from year to year. You will often see them purposefully make their way to one of the side exits rather than go through the center. Princeton University is unable to verify any legitimacy to this myth, though there have been several students who’ve alleged to have walked through on purpose or by accident, and still graduate as expected.

Drumthwacket

What is this “white house” that sits on State Highway 206N, between Lawrenceville and downtown Princeton? Many people think it is just another extravagant Princeton home but it is in fact Drumthwacket, the grand estate that has been the NJ Governor’s mansion for decades. Where did the name Drumthwacket come from and how did this property come to be?

On land once owned by William Penn, the home was built in 1835 by Charles Smith Olden, the man who would later become Governor from 1860-1863. He’d purchased this land from his grandfather, Thomas Olden (the small farmhouse now called Thomas Olden House, where Charles was born, had already been built there). After Olden’s death, the land and properties were purchased from his widow by Moses Taylor Pyne, who added onto the main house to grow the estate. Under Pyne, the east and west wings were built, and the property filled in with ponds, gardens and recreational areas. The estate was bequeathed to Pynes’ granddaughter, Agnes, who then sold it to Abram Nathanial Spanel. The inventor, scientist and the last private owner founded what became Playtex, and designed the Apollo spacesuit.

signup


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Drumthwacket, was purchased from the Spanels by the state of NJ in 1966, with the intent it become the governor’s residence. But that didn’t officially happen for decades, when funds were raised, and it was properly maintained. It kept its name, though – Drumthwacket – the name given to the home by Charles Smith Olden when he built it. It is believed he took the name from an old novel by Sir Walter Scott’s popular, A Legend (of the Wars) of Montrose, a Scots-Gaelic name that translates to mean “wooded hill.”

Surprisingly, with all that allure and stature, Drumthwacket has only been the full-time residence for 3 sitting governors, Olden (before it was owned by NJ) and then James Florio (1990-1994) and Jim McGreevey (2002-2004). While recovering from a car accident, Governor Corzine also briefly stayed there in 2007.

Einstein

“Imagination is more important than knowledge,” said Albert Einstein. But he likely never imagined people would be taking pictures and stopping by his house 68 years after his death! Perhaps the world’s most famous mathematician, Einstein lived in this house at 112 Mercer Street until he passed in 1955. Though many correctly affiliate him with the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS), there is often a misconception that he also worked as a professor at Princeton University (PU). He did not.

From the Shelby White and Leon Levy Archives Center, Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, NJ)

Is there a PU connection? Yes, there is, but he was never a professor there. When Einstein first came to visit Princeton in 1921, he delivered 5 lectures at PU and received an honorary degree. It wasn’t until the early 1930s that Abraham Flexner, the Founding Director of the Institute for Advanced Study, contacted Einstein back in Germany inviting him to come back and be amongst the first faculty to pursue self-directed research there. Einstein accepted and came in 1933, at a time of Nazi uprising in Germany. He feared for reprisals here in America so when he arrived, plans were made to bring him to town quietly and without fanfare. This letter, dated October 1933, confirms his first salary payment from IAS.

Where there is further confusion is that during his first six years with IAS (1933-1939), PU provided office space on campus at Fine Hall for Einstein and other Institute Faculty and School of Mathematics members. Though he may have given a further lecture at PU, he was never considered faculty there.

Upon Einstein’s death, this house was willed to Einstein’s stepdaughter. When she passed in 1986, it was left to the Institute.

Welcome to Princeton

When you drive into Princeton, have you ever taken notice of the sign welcoming you in? Turns out not everyone finds it so welcoming.

Princeton’s Civil Rights Commission officially brought up issue with the signs and made their case before Princeton Council at a recent April meeting, citing that the words “Settled 1683” are not inclusive of the Lenape people who lived here before that time. The discussion had been ongoing, with some residents suggesting new signs should be made to either pay tribute to the initial inhabitants, the consolidation or not have a date on it at all.

If you’re a stickler for words, then the term “settled” is a point that has some disagreeing with those residents and the commission, having pointed out that settling often refers to when one establishes land ownership. The Lenape were a nomadic people, and while they lived on much of the land known today as Princeton, they moved around often depending on the seasons.

If one agrees that settling equals land ownership, then 1683 is the correct verbiage. It was that year that Henry Greenland became the first European property owner in what eventually became Princeton, according to Historical Society of Princeton. In that same vein, to the north and south of Princeton, Montgomery’s sign says “Founded circa 1702” and Lawrence signs say “Founded 1697.”

Princeton Council heard the commission’s presentation last month, and many seemed to agree with the concerns and are open to considering something different. Shall the sign honor the Lenape in some way, should it make note of the consolidation of the township and borough in 2013, or something else entirely? Some around town are saying there is time and money better well spent and the signs should be left alone.

Municipal staff is currently working with the Civil Rights Commission to come up with replacement costs and new signage ideas, at which point it will be brought back to Council for further discussion.

Now gossip!

So, now you know the stories. You can now drive around town, past the gate, the sign and all of the homes and people mentioned here and know just a little bit more about how they came to be. Consider yourself a true Princeton insider! Share this information (or better yet, this entire article) to help ensure the true stories are passed along.

June Primary Election: Why Bother and What You Need to Know

Beyond its intention for narrowing down each party’s candidate pool to one contender, June primary voting is a way for candidates to test the waters and for voters to begin learning who the candidates are. In 2022, only 12% of eligible voters across Mercer County weighed in at the June primary election to determine which candidates would appear on the November ballot. That election included a vote for U.S. Congress, but both the Democrat and Republican races had only one candidate each. That was a negligent increase from the 11% turnout in 2021, a primary election that helped decide the candidates for NJ governor (there was only 1 Democratic candidate on that ballot, but there were 4 Republican contenders).

Primary election turnout is historically low here. For comparison, the 2021 general election in November had a 39% voter turnout from Mercer County, with 42% in 2022. This may be because Mercer County and more specifically Princeton often have uncontested races at the primary elections. That means the number of candidates on the primary ballot are the same or less than the number of places available, so all of those candidates will win and have their names on the general election ballots – regardless of votes. To some, this lack of debate over policy, budgets and more is of great concern.

So, how does one get motivated to vote in a primary election when there is no or little contest? For this June 2023 primary, Hopewell Borough is the only Mercer County municipality that will see multiple candidates for a role on the Democratic ticket, as they vie to be mayor. On the Republican ticket, only the NJ Assembly seat for the 14th Legislative District will have a contest (that includes E. Windsor, Hamilton, Hightstown and Robbinsville). Beyond those, there are just enough candidates, if that, to compete in the election for each role on both party tickets and no minimum vote required for them to win. The motivation to mail-in your ballot or go to the polls needs come from a desire to get engaged in local politics, partake in the democratic process and to show a candidate they truly have your support. The more local the position, the more impact their decisions likely have on your tax bill and day to day life. To help inform you, Princeton Perspectives is the only local publication to provide a detailed explanation of every candidate on the Princeton ballots, which you can read about below.

There are no national races this year. Mercer County residents will be voting for the positions of State Senate, General Assembly, County Executive, Sheriff and Board of County Commissioners. There are various municipal races as well, including here in Princeton.

VOTING ELIGIBILITY FOR THE PRIMARY

Everyone can actually vote in the primary. Yes, you read that right. While New Jersey law requires that you must be a registered Democrat or Republican when you cast your vote in the primary, that doesn’t preclude the 31% of Princeton voters that are registered unaffiliated from positioning themselves to cast that ballot. It just takes a little maneuvering.

“An unaffiliated voter can walk into a polling place at early voting or on election day, declare a party (D/R) and then vote for candidates of that party,” Mercer County Clerk Paula Sollami-Covello clarifies. “Once you vote in a Primary for a party, you are associated with that party and become registered in that party. You can go back to being unaffiliated after the election by filing proper registration paperwork with the Superintendent of Elections Office. In other words, you must take action to change back to an unaffiliated voter or you will remain a member of the party.”

This is an important measure to consider, especially in a county like Mercer, which has seen Democratic control for 20 years, preceded by 24 years of Republican control. In a town like Princeton, which has not had a Republican contender for Council since 2018, choosing which Democrats will make decisions about the town can also be a meaningful option.

HOW AND WHERE DO YOU VOTE?

If you registered for a Mail-in ballot, it should have arrived by now, though you can still register to receive one until May 30th. Otherwise, you can plan to head to the polls! There will again be an early voting period (June 2nd – 4th) with one polling location each in Trenton, Hamilton, Lawrence, Pennington, Princeton, East Windsor and Ewing. Primary Election Day will take place on June 6th. Your polling site will be stated on the sample ballot being mailed to you May 31st or you can search for it here.

You may recall last November officials were hand counting bags of ballots after there was an issue printing and scanning ballots on election day. Princeton Perspectives inquired what is being done to ensure this doesn’t happen again and have been told the Superintendent of Elections will have a public inspection of the voting machines to confirm everything is working properly. In addition, Sollami-Covello says they are planning more measures of protection.

“Dominion representatives will be assisting at the warehouse pre-election. Also, at my request, we were granted a new technical assistant and programmer from Dominion to work with our County and with our printer. There are also more internal checks taking place by all vendors and offices involved in ballot preparation, programming and testing. Lastly, poll workers are being trained to follow the advice of the Board of Elections, and no one else, if there is ever a problem with voting machines in the future,” she explains.

If you want to help ensure the elections run smoothly, the county is still looking to hire poll workers for this primary and November’s general election. A training fee of $30 is paid to workers in addition to compensation of $300/full day and $150/half day. Interested residents should go online to board of elections website and fill out application.

WHO IS RUNNING?

Primary races are only for Democrat and Republican candidates. Independent and other party candidates wait to run in November but the filing deadline for independent candidates to be listed on the General Election ballot is on primary Election Day, June 6th, at 4 PM. Because all school board elections in Mercer are nonpartisan, they are also not part of the primary election. The filing deadline for school board candidates for the November election is July 31st at 4pm.

If you plan to vote, it’s important to know who you are voting for. If not, it’s helpful to learn who is in the races, since independents still have an opportunity to compete for the fall.

Princeton Council candidates: David Cohen (D) and Leticia Fraga (D)

This year in Princeton, there are 2 Democratic incumbents vying to keep their seats. No Republicans are in the race, though it is still possible an Unaffiliated candidate could run against them in November. This position is for a three-year term.

David Cohen (D) is an incumbent looking to serve his third term on Princeton Council. Throughout his terms, he has been involved in several initiatives he wants to continue to see through. The new Master Plan, expected to be adopted by end of year, is something he looks forward to working with as a senior member of the Planning Committee. Stormwater management is another key issue for Cohen, which is in the midst of a feasibility study he hopes can help.

In addition, Cohen is hoping Princeton will adopt a Vision Zero Action Plan, something he’s been working on intended to create safer passageway for pedestrians and bikers. Lastly, he’d like to see the complete consolidation between the township and borough policies with unified zoning ordinances.

Leticia H Fraga (D) is also running for her third term on Princeton Council. She aims to continue her efforts of making policy decisions through an equity lens, seeking to improve the quality of life for all of Princeton’s residents.

Fraga believes Princeton is a flourishing community, and hopes to continue her efforts with updating infrastructure, partnering with businesses and the community, and ensuring all basic needs are accessible to vulnerable populations.

Mercer County Executive candidates: Dan Benson (D) and Lisa Richford (R)

The biggest race taking place throughout Mercer this June is for the position of Mercer County Executive. After 20 years in office, sitting County Executive, Brian Hughes, fought to keep his name on the ticket but after a strong fight from challenger Dan Benson for Democratic party support, he ultimately decided to retire. That leaves this as the only wide-open county race being held. The candidates are running for a 4-year term. Why should you care about this role? 28% of your annual property taxes go to the County. As the executive leader of the county, the Mercer County Executive sets the agenda and makes appointments like Governor Murphy does for the state or President Biden for the country. As the supervisor, director and controller of all county administrative departments, the decisions, guidance, operations and direction of county government lays on the shoulders of this leader. We will see in November if the Democrats hold onto the seat, or the Republicans win back county government?

Dan Benson (D) is running for his first term as County Executive, after gaining the support of his party over the sitting County Executive, Brian Hughes, at their recent convention. He has served the area since 2001 when elected to Hamilton Council at age 25. Benson then served on the County Commissioners Board (called County Freeholders at the time) for three years and has now been in the NJ Assembly since 2011.

He says he is seeking the County Executive role because the county needs to better oversee its finances. He also has a clear message on how to work together with all municipalities to improve health, jobs, transportation and opportunity.

Lisa Richford (R) has represented people throughout Mercer County as an attorney for the past 31 years, and now hopes to represent the county as their next executive. The sitting Mercer County Republican Committee Chair feels there has been a diminished quality of life for many Mercer County residents, and she hopes to change that by ending 20 years of one-party rule at the county level, providing better budget transparency, and rebuilding voters confidence in the election and voting system.

Having lived in Mercer County for 45 years, Lisa was raised by her mother, a Ukrainian immigrant and father, a US Marine. She also has a son about to graduate from Hamilton High West. Lisa currently serves as in-house counsel for a company seeking to find the cure for cancers exclusively affecting women.

signup


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Board of County Commissioners candidates: Lucylle Walter (D), John Cimino (D), Joseph Stillwell (R) and Denise “Neicy” Turner (R)

The Mercer County Board of Commissioners, the legislative branch of county government, has 2 incumbent Democrats and 2 challenging Republicans vying for the 2 open seats for a 3-year term.

Lucylle Walter (D) is an incumbent who has served as a County Commissioner (once called Freeholder) since 1998. She is hoping to continue serving alongside her running mate John Cimino because she believes they’ll offer continuity and experience that is needed.

With a new County Executive next year, and three of the seven Commissioners having only one term under their belts, Walter says that she and Cimino’s experience can be of great assistance when formulating new ideas and policies, presenting those to the administration and working with the rest of county government.

John Cimino (D) is also an incumbent. He has served twice as Board President since he was first elected to this role in 2009.

Affordability is the reason Cimino wants to continue to serve. He describes that to mean an array of things, from quality of life to better roads, more opportunities in higher education as well as by having clean and safe parks. Cimino seeks to ensure the needs of all in Mercer County are met.

Joseph Stillwell, (R) longtime Hamilton resident, says he is seeking to become a County Commissioner to bring common sense into county government, with primary goals of restoring fiscal responsibility and trust as well as protecting the environment of Mercer County.

About to graduate from Catholic University of America, Stillwell will take his history degree to graduate school where he seeks to become a certified teacher in New Jersey. He will bring his experience with civic organizations Knights of Columbus and American Legion Jersey Boys State to this role.

Denise “Neicy” Turner (R), a graduate of Trenton Central High School, is a 20-year resident of the capital city, mother of two and a grandmother. She is running to unseat an incumbent so she can serve her community and county, aiming to make sure budgets are properly met and addressing the many issues that need a Commissioner’s focus.

Turner currently works as a Medical Security Officer at the Ann Klein Forensic Center in West Trenton and also owns Daycare Greenacres, LLC, a home daycare providing childcare to families.

Mercer County Sheriff candidates: John “Jack” Kemler (D) and Bryan “Bucky” Boccanfuso (R)

The Sheriff oversees a variety of units for the county including “Court Security, a Tactical Response Team, K-9 Unit, Civil Process, Detective Bureau/ Fugitive Unit, Community Education Programs, Inmate Transportation, participation in Federal, State, and Local Task Forces, Airport Security and more,” according to the website. The position is for a three-year term.

John “Jack” Kemler (D) is the incumbent and has served in this role since 2010. He has a 40-year career in law enforcement that began in the Trenton Police Department and transitioned into roles at the Mercer County Sheriff’s Office, ultimately as Sheriff.

Kemler is running for a fifth term as Sheriff to continue his service to the county. He feels his respected leadership style, hard and honorable work and extra efforts to be thoughtful and fair are what helps keep the communities safe.

Bryan “Bucky” Boccanfuso (R) is hoping to unseat Kemler in an effort to bring his experience of more than 25 years of law enforcement to the role of Sheriff. Commitment, accountability, honor and respect are the tenets by which he intends to run the office, one which he says will serve all residents, business owners and visitors.

Boccanfuso was born and raised in Mercer County, and wants to provide a positive work environment, working as a team to benefit both the department and the county. As a full-time Sheriff, he hopes to help Mercer County be a beacon of law enforcement leadership.

State Senator candidates (16th Legislative District): Andrew Zwicker (D) and Michael Pappas (R)

At the state level, all 40 State Senate seats are up for election which leaves Princeton (part of the 16th Legislative District) voting for one, for a four-year term. The Senate works alongside the General Assembly as the legislative branch of NJ government, passing bills on policy, spending and taxes. This year we will see a rematch between the same two Senate candidates that ran in 2021.

Andrew Zwicker (D) is fighting to keep the seat he earned 2 years ago when Senator Kip Bateman retired. He took that role after four years serving in the General Assembly. A scientist and educator at Princeton University’s Plasma Physics Laboratory, Zwicker says evidence must be the guiding force behind decision making. If you vote early, you can thank Zwicker for his role in making that happen in NJ.

Michael Pappas (R) is hoping to unseat Zwicker, whom he went up against in 2021. Pappas brings years of experience to the table, having served on Franklin Township Council, then as its Mayor, on the Somerset County Board of Freeholders and as a one-term U.S. Congressman for the 12th Congressional District (prior to Rush Holt and now Bonnie Watson Coleman).

General Assembly candidates (16th Legislative District): Roy Freiman (D), Mitchelle Drulis (D), Ross Traphagen (R), Grace Zhang (R)

For 16th Legislative District voters in Mercer County (Princeton voters), NJ Assemblywoman Sadaf Jaffer’s departure creates one open seat, with one incumbent running to retain his. Voters will choose 2 candidates, to serve a two-year term in the General Assembly.

Roy Freiman (D) is running for his fourth term. A longtime central NJ resident, Freiman credits his past experience as an executive at Prudential Financial with helping him make smart financial choices for NJ. As Chairman of the New Jersey Assembly Agriculture and Food Security Committee, he has worked to preserve farms, enhance public parks and other outdoor spaces and also works to help eliminate obstacles for small business owners.

Mitchelle Drulis (D) has been involved in NJ politics since she became Legislative Aid to an Assemblyman 2000, now she wants to join the Assembly herself. Since then, she has served as Chief of Staff to another Assemblyman, then went onto help U.S. Congressman Tom Malinowski as Political Director during his candidacy then as his District Director during for the four years he served.

Through that role, Drulis learned to manage constituent services and secured millions in federal funding. As a small business owner, volunteering as class mom and at her church, she has learned skills she hopes to bring to the General Assembly.

Ross Traphagen (R) hopes to take his experience as a small business owner and two-time Councilman for the Town of Clinton and use it to work together to find common sense solutions with his peers in the Assembly.

Traphagen recalls that the support he gets from Republicans, Democrats and Unaffiliated voters has led him through two successful elections, and he hope to see that same support in this race. He lives with his wife in Clinton and hopes that for his family and others he can go to Trenton to help keep taxes and fees at a minimum, work to control overdevelopment and maintain New Jersey’s beautiful open space.

Grace Zhang (R) is seeking to join the General Assembly as a step to give back to New Jerseyans a little bit of what America has given her. She came here as a poor college student, seeking the American dream and she has found it by earning her master’s degree, becoming a certified public accountant, building her own consulting and accounting business and raising three children.

A resident of Princeton, Zhang hopes to help other small business owners through lower taxes and more incentives. She has been an advocate and volunteer at her children’s schools and hopes to build on that with educational opportunities for all. By continuing to support community activities, festivals and more she hopes to build stability and economic success across NJ.

Use this information to help inform your vote, now and for the General Election come November.

Editor’s Note

Around Princeton these days, many people are talking about Principal Frank Chmiel’s departure from Princeton High School. If it matters to Princeton, we cover it at Princeton Perspectives, and this issue has his exclusive interview.

But it’s not just the high school that is getting attention these days. Elementary school families are in turmoil about what their future holds, too. That is also covered in this April issue of Princeton PerspectivesA Caring Community Divided – What is Happening at Princeton’s Schools?

Everyone that lives in Princeton seeks to be affected by what is happening at our schools. The most information we can provide to date is straight from the source, and The Community Wants to Know: A Conversation with Frank Chmiel is his first interview since being put on administrative leave from Princeton High School in March. We reached out to the Board of Education and Dr. Carol Kelley as well, to provide the latest information available.

While Princeton Public Schools is involved in that, it is also working to figure out what the right changes are for elementary student placements. It has put any redistricting plans on hold while it listens to the community, which has a lot of ideas. Elementary Families Share Ideas as They Look Towards District Changes is a first look at what some parents see as tenable solutions.

Sadly, the situation at Princeton High School has caused controversy and varying viewpoints. Whether Frank Chmiel comes back as principal or not, Princeton High School will continue. As the PHS Divide Grows, Where Does the Community Go from Here? shares perspectives from a variety of community members on what is needed now to move forward.

Let us not forget that there are students at Princeton High School who have a vested interest, too. As the situation with Frank Chmiel unfolds, our student guest writer finds it is revealing the students have more needs than have been realized. The article PHS Students Are Looking Forward to Better Transparency and Understanding shares them.

Members of the Princeton community, even those with no children in school, can still feel the tensions around town. This month’s Pulse of Princeton asks their thoughts on how the community can move forward from this divide. Watch it now.

There is more happening around town than just our schools. There is new proposed legislation you may want to know about and opportunities to bring nature in your yard. Read more about them in this month’s Perspectives Revisited.

We hope that you are sitting outside, enjoying the early warm weather as you read our latest issue. We look forward to sharing more with you next month.

Elementary Families Share Ideas as They Look Towards District Changes

Elementary school parents at Princeton Public Schools (PPS) are on edge, wondering what the landscape will be for their children in the future. On March 21st, after the Princeton Board of Education (BOE) long-term plans were presented, many of Princeton’s elementary school parents spoke up. They showed up the next week to the BOE’s March 28th meeting to voice their thoughts as well. Concerned, confused and scared, parents raised objections to the proposed plans to shift certain neighborhoods to different elementary schools and possibly open an English-only learning track alongside Community Park’s (CP) Dual Language Immersion program (DLI). While parents have compassion for those from other schools, the proposed ideas of what could be are creating a large rift amongst the school communities.

Historically, all four Princeton elementary schools were English-only learning, with Spanish class offered to some grades. All homes were geographically districted to one of the four schools: CP, Littlebrook (LB), Johnson Park (JP) or Riverside (RS) Elementary Schools. When a dual-language immersion program was introduced at CP in 2015, it was first offered just to certain grades and to only students districted for that school. Over time, the program has grown to encompass all grades and welcomes almost any student in the district. However, all non-native Spanish speaking students moving into the area that are past 1st grade or CP-area families who choose not to be part of the of the program have had to choose a different elementary school to attend (Note: PPS has just expanded the entry options to include children entering 2nd grade). This has led to overcrowding at JP and LB, while CP now has some empty rooms. In addition, 1,100 new apartment units are planned, with more anticipated, which are expected to add hundreds more students to the mix. With an English-only track remaining for just the current 5th grade, CP was expected to become DLI-only this fall. But will it?

PPS administrators shared plans at the March 21st meeting to use the empty CP rooms to house an English-only track for all grades, redistrict some students from JP and LB to fill those seats, or possibly down the road shift all elementary students to a new “sister school” model with K-2 and 3-5 schools for all (including DLI).

Hearing clear disappointment from the community, PPS administrators quickly announced they will not move ahead with changes this fall but will instead begin to hold community meetings to learn what the stakeholders consider to be better options. As the meetings are expected to begin sometime this month, Princeton Perspectives caught up with some parents to find out what they think the long-term solution should be for the community. The ideas seem to vary based on the perspective they come from. Since CP was central to the proposed plan, we’ll start there.

Community Park Parents Fight for DLI-only School

“To add back an English-only track [at CP] would immediately limit any future growth and limit strengthening the program in the future,” shared Nicole Pezold Hancock, who has lived in Princeton for 12 years and has seen one child complete the elementary DLI program with another currently enrolled. She adds that the DLI program just had two reviews conducted that provided qualitative feedback to help them grow and hopes there’s an opportunity to realize them. “We were able to see structural weaknesses and history, but [the Tristate Consortium report] also said it’s an unpolished gem of a program and laid out some next steps the district could take to make it work better within the fabric of all district schools.”

Changing CP to include a full English-only track would hinder those plans, she notes, as a group of 40+ CP parents are working hard to work with PPS for better outreach, marketing and to enhance understanding amongst the rest of the community. Pezold Hancock also recalls the early days of DLI and English-tracks running side-by-side at CP.

“It was very stifling socially for some kids and created rifts between kids and some parents. There was self-segregating on the playground, at recess the kids wouldn’t play together,” she recalls.

Instead, Pezold Hancock agrees starting a Pre-K at CP could entice families to begin their school journey there and stay. She also thinks the district could entice immigrant families with children who don’t speak English to come, adding it will help them feel a more valued member of the classroom and if Spanish-speaking, even be a leader during the Spanish portions of the day. She and other parents of DLI students feel there is more opportunity to be had by better utilizing those empty classrooms for this program that’s already there.

“Our children are wonderful ambassadors for it—most will happily tell you how proud they are to be able to meaningfully play with a classmate who doesn’t yet speak English, write essays and explain complicated science concepts in Spanish, or feel pride in speaking their relatives’ native language at school,” notes Christine Minerva, who has lived in Princeton since 2014 and is parent to 3rd and 5th graders at CP.

It may take time to better market and grow DLI at CP, so if that time is provided, how should PPS address the overcrowding at JP and LB in the meantime? Minerva agrees there is no perfect solution but thinks one proposed by PPS leadership could work.

“Although I see several downsides to transitioning from preK-5 schools to a ‘sister schools’ model where students zoned for JP and CP (or LB and RS) would attend JP (or LB) for preK-2 and CP (or RS) for 3-5, perhaps doing so in the coming years would be a more equitable solution, since all students would be involved in the shift, and most would have an opportunity to attend a school close to their neighborhood for part of their education,” Minerva explains. “If PPS does move to that model, I hope that our administrators would build in time to study best practices for this type of transition, gain buy-in from leadership of the new DLI school and the community, and formulate a plan to integrate new staff members, students, and their families.”

Littlebrook Parents Have Other Ideas

In the Littlebrook section of town, parents at Littlebrook Elementary aren’t seeing things the same way. They feel the overcrowding is detrimental to their student’s education and experience.

“While I can appreciate the passion of the parents at CP – we all want what is best for our kids! – not accepting students when our other schools are overcrowded is not sustainable, or, quite honestly, fair to the remaining 80% of our elementary student population,” states Corinne Ryan, a seven-year Princeton resident with four children attending LB. “Each of my children sits in a classroom either at or 1 or 2 seats away from capacity. My 5th grade son has 23 students in his class, while CP has 5th grade class sizes of 15 students. Every inch of our school is utilized, and we are bursting at the seams.”

Kristi Cole agrees. She has lived in Princeton for seven years and has two children attending LB along with the 400 other students. Cole says her elementary community has maxed out the physical space citing there is no longer any flex space in the LB building, the stage is full of storage, and there is an annual battle over which grade will gain the one additional classroom.

“Fewer than half of the students zoned for CP attend CP. That’s not a marketing issue, those people had to make a decision or were forced to move out,” Cole says. “Last summer’s review of the DLI program also showed CP is 58% white vs. the district which is 49% white. It also said JP is the preferred school of Hispanic families. CP is additionally not being chosen by families with IEPs. I don’t think that’s a marketing issue, I think people are making informed decisions. We need to open the school to serve everybody. It’s a public school, we have to serve the whole public.”

Referring to the idea of adding in an English-only track to CP, Ryan additionally points out that other DLI programs, such as those in West Windsor, coexist successfully with English-only tracks, a program that could help guide the situation here in Princeton. She appreciates the complexity of redistricting students and thinks one-off situations could enable students to stay where they’re accustomed. In the long run, she feels it could be a better solution.

“While the plan would cause a population of JP students to move back to their neighborhood school of CP, and a beloved group of students to leave LB, overall, the plan evened out the elementary schools. It seemed to be a fair and equitable approach to the issue,” Ryan adds. “There would be growing pains for all, but the long-term goal is sensible leveling of enrollment, especially in light of the growth and development that Princeton is experiencing.”

It is important to note that the recommendation from PPS was to redistrict those students from Institute for Advanced Study that currently attend LB and send them to JP. Apart from three students, all of the Institute children are expected to turn over for next year, so most families would not be affected (those three would likely be grandfathered in).

Johnson Park Parents Want Equitable Options

That is not the case at JP, where children who have attended for years were told they might have to leave to go to CP, where they were originally districted. Many parents are saying that is not a fair option.

“We came at this problem over a long period of time, we can’t fix the problem overnight. You can’t just transfer the kids. They’re kids, not cattle,” contends Elme Schmid, 6-year resident of Princeton who has two children at JP. “It’s children we’re dealing with, many of whom are English language learners and depend heavily on their ESL teacher.”

Schmid says the most important thing is to consult with and get buy-in from the community for smoother transitions into whatever option the district ultimately chooses. In doing so, she recommends PPS considers their long-term goals first then work backwards to get to the interim plan to create the least disruption to everyone involved. One possibility Schmid suggests to help pull populations from the crowded schools into the CP DLI, is to have a plan and work harder to integrate any new children at CP with those already there and to help more students get up to speed in language to participate.

“I think they should offer children now in grade 2, not fluent in Spanish, an opportunity over the summer to prepare for immersion. We’ve given ESL education over summers for many years, why can’t we expand it to include that that. That would fulfill concerns for many JP and CP parents,” she notes.

Without integrating new children more smoothly into the CP community, there is fear of divide. And there already appears to be very different schools of thought from parents of children at the varying schools.

“This whole discussion is dividing the community instead of uniting us. It’s a shame, especially at the elementary school level,” noted Lindsay Weiss, a resident of Princeton for nearly five years, with 2 children at JP and a rising kindergartener. “The plan put forth by PPS was very shortsighted. It was a Band-Aid fix instead of a long-term solution or what makes the most sense.”

When asked what does, Weiss said that she feels it’s still unknown, citing not all the facts are fully realized. Maybe there’s space in other buildings that can be converted, perhaps there might be enough families that would elect to return or go to CP, families moving in downtown that might want to attend their neighborhood school.

“If you pull a random 57 kids from JP, that won’t necessarily be the right mix to fill enough classes per grade. I think for now they need to involve the community, which is their plan, and I think that was a really good decision. They need to take a slow and steady approach to how this should all pan out,” Weiss suggests. “They might need to survey every family to see who would want to move and at what grades.”

Riverside Parents Weigh in Too

RS sends approximately the same number of students to the DLI program as it receives from those opting out of it, so there isn’t a reason to consider shifting any of its students. That helps RS parents breathe a little easier knowing there will not be a large influx or send off of a group of students. There is an expectation that new neighborhoods being built will be districted for RS to help balance the school populations. Should a future plan involve creating sister schools, however, RS students will be subject to that change.

Jyoti Narasimhan has one child that went through RS and another currently attending. After living in Princeton for five years, she and other Riverside parents are eager to see what the future holds but she trusts in the process and is grateful changes are temporarily on hold.

“Drastic change is going to be controversial but at the same time I do understand there might need to be changes,” Narasimhan shares. “I think, as always more info and transparency and communication to Riverside parents would be great. I do feel the district has made a good faith effort to say information will be forthcoming and I know they’ll work with BOE in trying to move ahead with plans.”

Conclusion

The district meetings with parents have not yet started, but many know there is a lot to think about. While there are great differences in how people are looking to solve the enrollment problems, there is consensus some change is needed to ensure all elementary children’s needs are met.

Pulse of Princeton: How does the community move forward from this divide?

Editor’s Note

Princeton Perspectives is celebrating our 3rd birthday with this issue! From our first issue during COVID isolation in March 2020 until now, we have been growing and changing with our community. Your readership is what keeps up going, and we are so grateful.

As I watched the artist paint a new mural on Spring Street, I could see this project changing with each stroke of the paintbrush. Change can be beautiful. It can also take a lot of time, discomfort and adjustment. As Princeton grows and tries to meet the needs of all of its residents and visitors, there is bound to be change. Old streets are redone to make for better usage, old buildings are torn down to make way for hotels and new homes. Procedures change, either by necessity of cost or by desire. Sometimes people take to the changes quickly, and sometimes people make a lot of noise.

In the March issue of Princeton Perspectives, Change Can Be Hard. How Do We Know If It’s The Right Choice? we take a look at some of the various changes happening in our area, and offer facts, perspectives and background to help you better understand them so that you can decide what you feel is right.

What are your thoughts on recent local changes? That is what we asked locals for this month’s Pulse of Princeton. There is optimism abound and it is interesting to hear the varying changes on people’s minds.

Some Residents Want to Throw Away Princeton’s New Trash System, as you’ve likely heard. Perhaps it’s not all bad! Questions, confusion and frustration have caused many residents to call and complain or post comments on neighborhood chats. Princeton Perspectives has also heard from you. So, we’ve posed concerns to Councilwoman Eve Niedergang, and laid it all out there.

Another change that has many residents speaking out is the way Princeton is approaching affordable housing. How Affordable Housing Gets Added into Town is a Complex Decision, so this article offers two perspectives: one explaining what brought Princeton to where things are today and another offering additional things to consider.

Today is also the time to look towards tomorrow when it comes to the climate. Governor Murphy just put forth some new goals to save it. The Likelihood Local Residents Can Help NJ Meet New Climate Change Goals takes a look at what they are and offers local expertise and thoughts about how we’ll get there.

In order to be successful in a changing world, people nowadays often learn more than one language. In the Princeton area, there are schools that can educate children in dual language and bilingual programs from an early age. Changing Opportunities Ensure Bilingual Education for More Students shares information about a new program coming this fall.

In this month’s Perspectives Revisited we update you on two stories we’ve recently covered. Teen’s mental health continues to be a growing concern, so read on to learn about the latest news. We’re also taking a look at how the warm winter has affected the region’s maple tapping, adding more information to last month’s article.

As you ponder all of the changes happening around, speak up if you have a concern or objection. Ask questions if you find things aren’t clear. Change can sometimes be a mistake, but it might also be for the better.

Next issue, we will have changed seasons as well. I hope you enjoy the remainder of winter and thank you, as always, for reading. Please do reach out by emailing here if you have any ideas for future stories or comments on what you’ve read.

The Pulse of Princeton: What are your thoughts on recent local changes?

Some Residents Want to Throw Away Princeton’s New Trash System

Garbage is dirty by nature. And Princeton’s recent change to a new trash system is certainly getting grimy, with some residents voicing anger over everything from the single 64-gallon trash cans for all to costs for additional barrels and more. To delve a little deeper, Princeton Perspectives asked Councilmember Eve Niedergang, who is a member of the municipal Infrastructure and Operations Committee, to respond to concerns and thoughts residents have shared with us.

Concern: We’ve heard the rationale – that there are few choices now in trash haulers and the costs have gone up drastically. It’s said the alternative choices for Princeton would’ve cost taxpayers more. But why did we switch to a whole new trash pick-up system? What’s the previous cost versus the new costs with Interstate Waste Services?

Eve’s Response: Interstate Waste Services acquired the company we used to use for trash. We’re required by law to go out and bid and when we did, we only got 1 bid, from them. It’s not 100% clear why we’re only getting one bid. There are definitely some issues of consolidation in the industry and also, they are having trouble finding staff. This system enables one person to do the job with a much lower injury rate than you’d have otherwise. In the normal pre-COVID world, it would be a concern that this eliminates jobs, but this will actually allow these companies to survive. We worked with a waste consultant, Wayne Defeo, one of the premiere people in the state on recycling/waste issues, and he knew the old way we ran trash pickup would be more expensive. So, our bid request was only with the new trucks/bins. We had some ideas based on what other municipalities were seeing with 70-100% increases. This bid came in just about 50% higher than our old contract, even with the things we introduced.

Concern: How about consolidating with neighboring towns to force these haulers to lower prices and make trash removal more affordable for municipalities?

Eve’s Response: No, we didn’t actively consider it. We share a facility in Lawrence where we take our leaves and brush, and it’s really complicated. Plus, their trash contract doesn’t expire until 2024 or 2025, so what are the chances to find a neighboring town whose contract ends at the same time? We signed a several year contract, so it’s going to be a while before we’re looking, but it is something I’d definitely consider exploring with the new county executive, to have multi-town hauling to achieve some better cost control.

Concern: Taxpayers pay for trash removal as part of their municipal taxes and Princeton has the highest taxes around. One resident said this feels like a form of socialism – as everyone has the same size bin, no matter their circumstances. How do you explain that 1–4-unit dwellings or homes with numerous children have the same size container as single person households?

Eve’s Response: Infrastructure and Operations did crunch the numbers and very few households in town generate more than what would fit in a 64-gallon can. There are some, but it’s not a lot. This was another effort again to contain costs. Our waste consultant encouraged this, thinking it provides an incentive for people to think about what they’re buying or getting rid of. We have a financial assistance program for people for whom a 2nd bin would be a hardship. I know things comes wrapped, you can’t always control it, but it’s a cost control measure. Every municipality makes a decision about what it offers to residents and what it doesn’t. Montgomery and Hopewell don’t offer any trash pickup. I understand people being upset, as residents are paying a lot of taxes, but the municipality could’ve decided to not have trash service at all. We have to be guardians for all people.

Concern: Lawrence has 95-gallon carts, and each additional is a 1-time lease of $45 or $55. That, compared to Princeton’s 64-gallon bins and charging up to $300/year for a 2nd can, if needed? Can the town work with the can supplier or order in bulk to lower that price?

Eve’s Response: Lawrence will be renegotiating their contract soon and let’s stay tuned, they’re going to have to make some of the same choices. We thought about a 95-gallon cart, but some seniors are complaining the 64 is too hard to maneuver. 95 seemed unnecessary for the vast majority of households. If you are using a 2nd can, those are costs the municipality has to bear. A full 2nd can would cost us about $600/yr. So, we halved that amount and we have to pass that on. Ordering in bulk wouldn’t offset the costs, because it’s not the can, it’s the weight of the garbage.

Concern: What if a resident has several additional bags of trash from hosting a party? Cleaning out the basement? Wrappings from new purchases? How are they supposed to get rid of them? People are talking about putting trash in other places. Are they going to use dumpsters at large complexes? Top off a neighbor’s emptier bin? What’s the alternative?

Eve’s Response: We have no official policy for an alternative. If there’s no food in them, perhaps you can store them for a week. I’d ask some neighbors if they had room. I’d be willing to let my neighbors put their trash in my bin. I think most people would be willing to help a neighbor out on occasion. If you’re truly generating more trash than 2 64-gallon containers all the time, you’ll have to find a dump willing to accept that. That’s not something we’ve looked into. If it turns out a lot of people have that problem, we’ll have to look at it.

Concern: RFID tags are tracking devices on each cart? It makes sense so they don’t get lost, but how do you explain that to residents that feel government is watching?

Eve’s Response: It’s not to track people, it’s not a GPS, it’s a radio frequency identification tag with a narrow range of a few hundred feet. The tag is really so that if somebody takes your cart and it’s not at your house, we know that and can provide a replacement. Since we’re charging for extra carts, it creates incentive to take one from someone else, so it enables us to track that the carts are at the right house. It’s a very limited system which is pretty standard in these types of carts.

Concern: With the addition of the new, town-required cans, people are throwing away their old large plastic trash cans. It is so wasteful both financially (as people bought them) and environmentally. How does an environmentally and cost-conscious town like Princeton allow for this?

Eve’s Response: That was definitely a concern. We are hoping people participate in some of the things we’ve outlined, and Sustainable Princeton has come up with uses for existing trash cans such as collecting yard waste, composting, using them as rain barrels. Once they get picked up from peoples’ houses, we’ve had landscapers express an interest in having some of them. People have also put out notices on social media such as Freecycle and Buy Nothing where people can pass them along to someone in a neighboring town to continue using them. We’re not happy about the environmental burden but there was no other way to move forward with these initiatives other than replacing the cans. We hope people that are willing to put in a little time or effort to reuse or pass along their old cans.

Concern: What’s the right way to place your can?

Eve’s Response: Ideally, if you’re on a street wide enough to not cause traffic issues, you should place it with the wheels against the curb with the metal bar facing out. If it’s going to cause problems with others drivers or parking, place the bin where you normally would, with the wheels towards house, and the metal bar facing out. Right now, workers are manually picking up all cans because the new trucks aren’t ready. But soon we will need the cans facing the right way for the tipper arm. If, however, you live on a narrow street like Bank Street, we’ll just continue to use regular crews on those streets.

Concern: You’ve mentioned this new system creates incentives for residents to reduce the amount of trash they generate by reducing, reusing, recycling, and composting. Mercer County only accepts #1 and #2 for recycling, so the rest is trash. Composting is not an option for most homeowners. What is Princeton doing to better allows for these options and educate locals?

Eve’s Response: We and Sustainable Princeton have been doing some educational outreach. It is really hard to get people’s attention. We reached out to local newspaper and, everybody got a flyer with the new trash information which suggested ways to reuse old trash cans, and there’s stuff on our website. We can always do better and we’re learning every day, but this is a new reality. There’s no more place to send stuff, we used to send stuff to China and that stopped. As a society we need to change and as a government we need to use our tax dollars wisely. So, it’s going to be a learning curve for everyone to figure out. Long term, I’d like Mercer County to start taking #5 recyclables as well. I’d like to see industries responsible for the amount of packaging they generate. We are asked to fix the problems that occur much further upstream from us. And residents bear the burden. I’m not saying these solutions are perfect, but we couldn’t go forward with a doubling of our hauling costs. We’ll continue to hear and listen if there are things we can do to address needs and concerns people have raised.

If you have a policy concern, you can reach out directly to Eve by emailing her at eniedergang@princetonnj.gov. If you have a logistical concern about your trash can or pick-up, you can email the waste team directly at wasteinfo@princetonnj.gov.

The Likelihood Local Residents Can Help NJ Meet New Climate Change Goals

March 7th was the first day of 2023 that residents woke up to snow-covered trees and grass all season. There was frequent 50° weather throughout February. A tornado touched down in Lawrence. Flooding of the Stony Brook, Delaware River and other local waterways has become normal. These are signs, many say, of climate change.

THE PLANS FOR NJ

In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has laid out plans to counter climate change since he came into office. A 2019 Energy Master Plan set a goal of 100% clean energy by 2050. Numerous Executive Orders have been signed since, setting other regulation changes. Now, there is an updated plan, put forth by the governor in February, which expedites the large-scale goals. It aims to have New Jersey using 100% clean energy by 2035 instead of 2050 and calls for all cars and light trucks sold in the state to be electric by 2035 as well. How necessary are these changes? Are they realistic? How can local residents move towards them?

“I think the goals announced by Governor Murphy are a combination of realistic and aspirational, as all goals should be,” says Christine Symington, Executive Director of Sustainable Princeton. “The proceeds from RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative), federal incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and the CHIPS and Science Act provide the funds and market signals, and the climate-conscious generation entering the workforce provides the momentum to achieve the goals.”

With those financial incentives in place, is Mercer County prepared to achieve them? Experts says much of it depends on how the infrastructure is changed to enable it. That means reducing dependency on cars for transportation (by encouraging walking, biking, carpooling and public transportation use), residents making use of the available grants to upgrade or change the power supply to their homes or businesses (to solar rather than gas, for example), developing and utilizing more alternate energy sources (nuclear reactors, hydrogen hubs, increased wind and solar opportunities) and working with utility companies to ensure their grids and lines can handle this energy.

PERSPECTIVES ON THE GOALS

A recent Princeton Perspectives survey of 50 local residents shows that 60% of them believe it is feasible for 100% of the electricity sold in NJ to come from clean sources by January 2035. They state that a change in use, taking advantage of the right opportunities and utilizing the right incentives can make it possible.

“The path to 100% clean energy is difficult, but one that is born out of necessity, and not out of choice. In order to secure the future for generations to come, we must all come together to make this a reality,” shares Venkat Yaddanapudi. Respondent Abigail Rose adds, “Crucial goal. Our planet and all humankind are at stake.”

The 40% that do not believe it is realistic to meet this goal think 12 years simply isn’t enough time for such change, citing the infrastructure won’t be ready by then, the cost is too high with still not enough money for these investments, and citing concern such changes will lead New Jersey to become reliant on sources out of state and even the country instead.

“The law caps nuclear at 40%, meaning 60% would have to come from sources like wind and solar that are not cost-effective and depend on the weather. Eliminating natural gas, which currently supplies most of NJ’s electricity, would lead to skyrocketing costs and an unreliable grid,” one local wrote on the survey. Another added though they think it’s possible, “there are three big obstacles: 1) the aging, complex grid, 2) sufficient battery storage and 3) permitting obstacles for new, renewable projects.”

CREATING OPPORTUNITIES

Erick Ford, President of New Jersey Energy Coalition, admits that 2035 is soon, and agrees with the previously stated obstacles, but feels with the right planning, such as upgrading high voltage lines to increase power capabilities, we can get there.

“The technological advances we’ve seen over the last 10 years is amazing. Fuel cells are going to be a key piece of it, they have zero emissions, can produce electricity on demand, produce hydrogen and capture CO2 as well. This is an energy resource that can be placed anywhere within the distribution grid and help cars charge, etc.,” Ford explains. “Hydrogen is going to be a bigger piece of the energy sector. Hydrogen hubs are being developed. We have nuclear power. Solar and wind are also opportunities. “

Gov. Murphy has a goal to create 11,000 megawatts of power (enough to power approximately 3 million homes) from wind turbines by 2040. There is currently just one wind farm off Atlantic County, but more are being planned and New Jersey Board of Public Utilities just announced it is accepting more applications. Each turbine is said to provide enough energy to power 2,500 homes. But they have also been a cause for concern. So far in 2023, nine whales have turned up dead along the coast, and many are blaming the turbines for their deaths. A necropsy on the most recent whale indicated trauma consistent with propeller wounds. So, can this be the infrastructure of the future?

Once NJ figures out the best infrastructures, even with proper incentives it will take a lot of will to move towards clean energy. With 169,304 solar installations so far across New Jersey, as of March 2023, nearly 46% of our local survey respondents stated they do not use any forms of clean energy in their homes today. Only 10% currently use solar energy at their homes with another 18% hoping to use it soon. In 2021, Princeton Day School became the first school in Princeton to utilize solar energy.

THE ELECTRIC CHARGE

One step that feels more feasible for locals is the change to an electric vehicle (EV). 52% of those that took the survey already have or are planning to purchase a partially or all electric car.

“There are incentives available right now through PSE&G for energy efficiency upgrades and EV charging infrastructure to residents, multifamily, and commercial property owners. The State of New Jersey has rebates for electric vehicles,” Symington adds.

In addition to those in private homes, New Jersey currently has 868 public charging stations statewide. Mercer County and municipalities like Princeton are also working to provide local charging stations, making it easier to own such vehicles and helping to make to make it possible to reach Murphy’s goal of selling only electric cars and light trucks in NJ by 2035. Level 2 Chargers are installed at 11 sites throughout Mercer County with Direct Current Fast Chargers planned for 2 more locations. Specifically in Princeton, there are currently six public EV charging stations around town. Eight new EV charging stations are also now located in the municipal building parking lot. Three Level 2 Charging stations can be found on the Princeton University campus business, like The Peacock Inn, also offer charging. PlugShare, Open Charge Map, and ChargeHub are websites/apps that show you where a charging station can be found.

Nearly 46% of those that took our survey believe that if all new cars sold are electric, New Jersey will be able to meet an expanded need for charging stations, as many people will likely charge in their homes. 10% think NJ will never be all electric, so it doesn’t matter. And, going electric also raises others concerns; can everyone afford an electric vehicle and are lithium batteries the answer?

“Right now, there is no way to recycle the lithium batteries which is an environmental nightmare. Child labor is being used to mine the rare earth metals required to make these batteries and what little water resources exist are being drained to get these metals, leaving peoples that could never afford to own an electric car without the means to grow crops and raise livestock, which will result in widespread famine in a number of 3rd world nations,” one respondent put forth.

THE WAY FORWARD

To move the needle forward, many shared with Princeton Perspectives that even more significant tax subsidies are needed to make electric vehicles more affordable. Beyond transportation and solar power, locals also shared they are planting a garden, changing to LED lighting, and switching to more “energy star” appliances. But residents are still beholden to the infrastructure around them.

“This really comes from energy companies transitioning to clean energy. My current apartment uses a gas stove and is in an old building. I don’t foresee my landlord spending money to increase the electrical panel to allow for more capacity anytime soon,” Princeton resident Nick DiDomizio explained on our survey.

Government mandates on industry could help us get there. If the funding is there, and if everyone works towards this common goal, Ford says cleaner forms of energy can be gathered then stored. He thinks companies are working towards this, to help make it a reality for New Jersey.

BP is putting out a storage component. Once we have incentives for energy storage, you’ll have a known opportunity there. Wind turbines produce a certain amount of electricity. You don’t need it all at once, but if you have storage and then can push it onto the grid, when necessary,” Ford details. “You can have a battery bank connected to a grid that can store electricity of school buses during the summer when they’re used less. If done right, you can get there. It’s not easy.”

Nothing ever is. The clock is now ticking, 12 years and counting. In short time it will be evident if companies, the state and the residents have the will and opportunities to go clean.